<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philosophical.journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Philosophy is not about answers. It is about asking the right questions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:24:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Philosophical.journal" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Rawls e la pubblicità</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/rawls-e-la-pubblicita/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/rawls-e-la-pubblicita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stabilità]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nel precedente post, ho criticato la spiegazione e la difesa del vincolo di pubblicità in Rawls da parte di A. Williams. Ora invece provo a spiegare per quali ragioni, secondo me, la pubblicità è rilevante. Lo scopo della teoria dei &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/rawls-e-la-pubblicita/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=330&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/rawls-e-la-pubblicita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Williams su Rawls e il &#8220;sistema pubblico di Regole&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/williams-su-rawls-e-il-sistema-pubblico-di-regole/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/williams-su-rawls-e-il-sistema-pubblico-di-regole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Una Teoria della Giustizia, Rawls fa riferimento a tale questione quando spiega l’idea che la struttura di base sia l’oggetto [subject] dei principi primi di giustizia. Rawls scrive che la struttura di base della società è un “sistema pubblico &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/williams-su-rawls-e-il-sistema-pubblico-di-regole/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=321&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/williams-su-rawls-e-il-sistema-pubblico-di-regole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>quest&#8217;uomo lavora quasi quanto il nostro presidente operaio</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/questuomo-lavora-quasi-quanto-il-nostro-presidente-operaio/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/questuomo-lavora-quasi-quanto-il-nostro-presidente-operaio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia and U.S. Report Breakthrough on Arms<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=319&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/questuomo-lavora-quasi-quanto-il-nostro-presidente-operaio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Da Cohen a Berlusconi, passando per Rawls e il calcio</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/da-cohen-a-berlusconi-passando-per-rawls-e-il-calcio/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/da-cohen-a-berlusconi-passando-per-rawls-e-il-calcio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calcio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G. A. Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identità nazionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[razzismo verso gli italiani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stabilità]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uno dei meriti delle critiche mosse da G.A. Cohen alla teoria di Rawls è sicuramente il fatto di avere provocato, per reazione, una rinascita dell&#8217;interesse da parte della &#8220;scuola Rawlsiana&#8221; nei confronti della cosidetta &#8220;pubblicità&#8221; della giustizia  (si veda ad &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/da-cohen-a-berlusconi-passando-per-rawls-e-il-calcio/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=309&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/da-cohen-a-berlusconi-passando-per-rawls-e-il-calcio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A difesa del dualismo giustificativo</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/una-difesa-del-dualismo/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/una-difesa-del-dualismo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eguaglianza di Opportunità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principio di Differenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second principle of justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come spiego in questo post, ritengo che sia possibile interpretare il passaggio nel quale Rawls introduce l&#8217;idea di reciprocità come interpretazione del principio di differenza( §17 TJ) in due modi diversi, a seconda che si pensi che tale idea debba &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/una-difesa-del-dualismo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=293&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/una-difesa-del-dualismo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questa è probabilmente la notizia più importante del giorno</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/questa-e-probabilmente-la-notizia-piu-importante-del-giorno/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/questa-e-probabilmente-la-notizia-piu-importante-del-giorno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diario personale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; e per una volta, non è una brutta notizia: U.S. Congress Approves Bill to Extend Health Care to Millions<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=291&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/questa-e-probabilmente-la-notizia-piu-importante-del-giorno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rawls, luck egalitarian?</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/rawls-luck-egalitarian/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/rawls-luck-egalitarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luck egalitarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principle of redress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reciprocità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[L&#8217;ostacolo più grande che bisogna superare per mostrare che Rawls non fa ricorso alla principio di giustizia luck-egalitarian è spiegare il ruolo delle considerazioni Rawlsiane sull&#8217;arbitrarietà dei talenti naturali. Quello che battezzo &#8220;principio di giustizia luck egalitarian&#8221; afferma che se &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/rawls-luck-egalitarian/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=267&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/rawls-luck-egalitarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google translation of the previous post</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/google-translation-of-the-previous-post/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/google-translation-of-the-previous-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difference principle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality of Opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google translate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the google translation of my previous post. (In brackets, required corrections) &#8221; Starts google translation What is wrong in this topic [argument]? March 18, 2010 · Leave a Comment Preconditions [a] to E &#8216;right to reduce the inequalities &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/google-translation-of-the-previous-post/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=260&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/google-translation-of-the-previous-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>dov&#8217;è l&#8217;errore in questo argomento?</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/dove-lerrore-in-questo-argomento/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/dove-lerrore-in-questo-argomento/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difference principle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eguaglianza di Opportunità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality of Opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principio di Differenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Premesse a E&#8217; giusto ridurre le diseguaglianze dovute a fattori moralmente arbitrari (non-arbitrarietà) b se una diseguaglianza è permessa da un principio che esprime una concezione adeguata della reciprocità, allora è giusta (reciprocità debole). c. Il  principio di differenza esprime &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/dove-lerrore-in-questo-argomento/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=244&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/18/dove-lerrore-in-questo-argomento/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monismo e pluralismo giustificativo</title>
		<link>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/monismo-e-pluralismo-giustificativo/</link>
		<comments>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/monismo-e-pluralismo-giustificativo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loimi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice as Fairness: interpretative issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality of Opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Una versione un po&#8217; più precisa del post precedente: E&#8217; possibile fornire due interpretazioni assai diverse del &#8220;significato&#8221; della concezione dell&#8217; &#8220;Eguaglianza Democratica&#8221;, a seconda di come si interpreta il suo rapporto con le considerazioni sull&#8217;arbitrarietà morale di alcune diseguaglianze, &#8230; <a href="http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/monismo-e-pluralismo-giustificativo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5504714&amp;post=230&amp;subd=philosophicaljournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophicaljournal.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/monismo-e-pluralismo-giustificativo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40fc315076cffdf8969c246f35977b8?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">loimi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
